ABC news and Australian Associated Press (AAP) “fact-checkers” have impugned several South Australian councils for raising concerns about mRNA “vaccine” contamination.
The journalists have employed the tactic of lying by omission over the widespread concerns about tests showing Australian Covid vaccine vials were contaminated.
Three councils in the Limestone Coast region, the district councils of Grant and Robe and the Naracoorte-Lucindale Council, as well as their Local Government Association, have passed motions calling on state and federal health ministers to “ensure all vaccinations, both present and future, are tested to ensure they are free from contaminants and safe for human vaccination”.
The concerns at a local government level were first publicly raised by Port Hedland Town Council in WA last year, which decided to support a national awareness campaign on the matter.
Livingstone Shire Council in Central Queensland has also passed on a petition signed by nearly 500 residents supporting national action on the contamination scandal.
Port Hedland councillors had been alerted by Victorian MP Russell Broadbent, who had earlier written to Prime Minister Albanese after mRNA vaccine vials sent from Australia to Canada had been examined and found in laboratory tests to be contaminated by DNA.
In his letter of September 20, 2024, Mr Broadbent called on the government to immediately suspend the use of Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products due to the evidence of significant synthetic DNA contamination, as detailed in a report by Dr David Speicher, who examined the samples.
The letter was prepared by barrister Julian Gillespie and signed by more than 50 doctors, scientists and academics. Neither the ABC nor AAP mentioned Mr Broadbent or his the letter and simply quoted the denials of health department officials who have repeatedly dodged questions over vaccine safety in recent Senate committee hearings.
Neither did the ABC or AAP mention the concerns over mRNA contamination by eminent virologist and oncologist Prof. Angus Dalgleish (interviewed above), whose video testimony convinced the Hedland councillors to take action.
In an interview with UK medical commentator Dr John Campbell last year, Prof. Dalgleish spoke of his tour of New Zealand and Australia with a team, raising the alarm over Covid-19 shots being given to people who had already been infected.
Standard medical practice is to not vaccinate people for a particular disease after they been infected – rabies being the only exception. Prof. Dalgleish was also shocked to find GPs who had been struck of the register for “quite rightly not prescribing the booster to patients who had had terrible reactions to the first two shots”.
“All common sense went out the window with this – not with the doctors, I would defend them to the end – the common sense to manage this pandemic went out the window from the very, very top of the government and all the way down, and I’m furious at all the agencies that supported this nonsense – the royal colleges, the BMA (British Medical Association) and the doctors’ unions etc., the National Health Service and the chief medical officer …. they all fell for this. They must have known it was wrong, wrong, wrong,” he told Dr Campbell.
The fact that Victoria’s Covid lockdown and curfew was made without medical or scientific advice should tell the ABC and AAP something about the serious lack of integrity around information they circulated during that entire event. But no, these media cowards see their job as defending bureaucrats.
But the ABC did find one academic willing to whitewash mRNA shots, University of Queensland infectious disease physician and clinical microbiologist Professor Paul Griffin who has worked on the development of 125 vaccines and “malaria human challenge studies”.
He said the councils’ motions “imply that past vaccines had not gone through a rigorous testing process”.
“We have one of the strictest regulatory environments in the world,” Professor Griffin told the ABC. We might ask who the professor means by “we”? The University of Queensland or the US-based Pfizer-BionTech and Moderna? The report does not specify.
The ABC went on to note that the Canadian study on the contamination claimed to confirm earlier findings by US molecular biologist Dr Philip Buckhaultz, “but those findings have been debunked by fact-checking organisation AAP FactCheck.”
In fact Prof Buckhaultz did not make a claim. The professor advanced the theory that DNA in the jab could be the cause of “rare but serious side effects” including a “theoretical risk of future cancer”. He is not the only scientist to advance that theory either.
The previously mentioned Dr David Speicher and four other medical scientists found DNA fragments in COVID19 vaccines sourced from Ontario, Canada. The DNA fragments were detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
The findings were published on the medical report pre-print website OSFPreprints for review. Neither the ABC nor AAP Factcheck mentioned this.
As might be expected, Prof Buckhaulz made it clear that his claims were theoretical and haven’t been tested, so to claim he has been “debunked” is quite misleading.
AAP Fact Check, in its January 2024 report on the Buckhaultz theory, quoted the European Medicines Agency as saying they “had not seen any reliable evidence of an association between mRNA vaccines and adverse events that could be linked to the presence of DNA material.”
The US FDA (pre-Trump) gave a predictable response to cover itself: “While concerns have been raised previously as theoretical issues, available scientific evidence supports the conclusion that the vaccines are safe and effective.”
The ABC also quoted Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) that said “it was aware of “misinformation” in media and online reports regarding COVID-19 vaccines”. But the TGA also admitted to AAP that residual DNA was a “manufacturing impurity found in very low levels in many medicines and vaccines”.
Meanwhile the Tasmanian doctor and West Tamar councillor Dr Julie Sladden, said on a Rumble channel last year that the contamination had been confirmed by at least five independent laboratories. Dr Sladden was not able to convince her council to take action, despite strong public support.
Dr Sladden also noted that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine had been found to have the cancer-linked SV-40 sequence, as confirmed by Kevin McKernon, of the Human Genome Project – another fact omitted by the ABC and AAP Factcheck.
Separately, a study published by Science Direct titled “Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis” outlines the very real concerns about mRNA vaccines.
“We urgently need controlled experimental studies for a better understanding of mRNA vaccine safety. Specifically, we need to know whether nms-mRNA activates different intracellular nucleic acid sensors to those activated during SARS-Cov-2 infections…” the authors write.
Further, they state: “Hence, individuals with particular genetic polymorphisms in genes that encode DNA sensors, such as TREX1, that are exposed to cellular stress and inflammatory stimuli related to the nms-mRNA and to the accumulation of DNA following up-regulation of TEs, may be at more risk of developing severe inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, and carcinogenesis. If this is so, then the ‘one size fits all’ approach of mass vaccination using nms-mRNA technology would not be a safe public health measure for humanity.
“If our hypothesis were to be confirmed, the implications for public health would be staggering and appalling in the context of the mass-scale COVID-19 vaccination already taking place, particularly if the nms-mRNA enters brain [82], bone marrow [84], and – if already present in the vaccinee – cancerous or pre-cancerous cells [143], or if the vaccine is administered to females early in their pregnancy and the nms-mRNA transfects embryonic cells [77].”
