BY MICHAEL SLOVANOS
YOUNG men should take some blunt and crude advice from some of the old blokes at Cairns News: Put it away.
A man of the cloth might advise learning some self-control or even better, going the traditional marriage path and producing some future Australians in a safe home environment.
The other path, the sleazy nightclub pick-up-the-chick “lifestyle” blasted out by popular culture is full of booby (no pun intended) traps that can plague you with all sorts of serious consequences. And now with brainwashed Labor Party feminists in power across the country, men are even more the target in their legal system grinder.
Our featured photograph is of the pathetic figure of a Chinese landlord being put through a struggle session during the Maoists’ “Great Leap Forward”, a practice popular during the later Cultural Revolution, Guangdong, circa 1953. Something like a struggle session awaits male offenders charged under Queensland’s new anti-“sexual violence” laws.
Queensland, like NSW, Victoria, the ACT, South Australia and Tasmania, has a new definition of “sexual consent” that makes loose living young and not-so-young blokes the easy target of feminists who sit on court benches and in lawyers’ offices.
The problem for these blokes is that if a loose-living female finds herself feeling violated or cheated after some sexual encounter, the man-hating, cultural femo-Marxist brigade will be on her case in a flash. But why? you ask. “She was willing and seemed to think everything was hunky dory ‘coz I’m a rippled stud and ya know, they can’t help themselves.”
Dude, wake up to yourself and wake up to the “new style” government that wants to control you right down to your personal passions and desires. We suggest you read George Orwell’s “1984” (or watch one of the movies) and especially the part about Pornosec, a division of the Ministry of Truth, and the Junior Anti-Sex League.
The new “anti-sex” laws in Queensland, for instance, include the “affirmative consent model”, along with the criminalisation of “stealthing”, which means removing the condom during the act. The feminist anti-sex bridgade have now made this “stealthing” activity the same as the crime of rape.
Dopey dudes might object: “But we were told by the Edgacayshin Department in our skool that sex with anyone, anyhow, anytime was a natural thing!” Dude, again, wake up and learn what’s going on. We’re in a cultural revolution in which 1 + 1 = 3 because the state says so. Just because they tell you unrestricted sex is “all good” it doesn’t mean they won’t jail you for doing it.
Queensland Labor’s Minister for Prevention of Domestic and Family Violence, Shannon Fentiman, and her comrades at the ABC provide the detailed example of a “woman of colour” named Mia and her “date” who were having sex. The “date” apparently removed the condom and Mia objected, warning she could get pregnant.
“That was more than a decade ago, and until recently, Mia couldn’t explain why she felt so violated,” the ABC reported. “But learning what had happened had a label — stealthing — helped her process the deception.” Your government says she’s a woman and she’s the victim of “gendered violence”, of which men are almost always the perpetrators.
We would suggest Mia’s feeling of violation was more to do with being used for sex with no commitment – and she should share responsibility for that. She could have said no, and any forcing of the issue by the male is in the dangerous realm of rape, that has been recognised as a crime for time immemorial.
So now we have state governments across Australia now intimately involved not just with cases of rape, but in a detailed part of the act of sex. Whether this extends to married couples we don’t yet know, but it probably does because the neo-Maoist cultural revolutionaries have no respect for the institution of marriage either.
“We know disproportionately women and girls are victims of sexual assault,” Fentiman told the ABC. According to her it wasn’t enough that Queensland laws previously only defined consent as “being freely and voluntarily given by a person with the cognitive capacity to give it”. Now it has moved to change this definition to replace the word “given” with “agreed”.
“Our new laws explicitly recognise that consent must be affirmative and must be given,” Fentiman said. What Fentiman and her ilk are really thinking is “Or else boyo, we’ll do you over in the court because we love demonstrating our power over men and controlling the act of sex itself. We are God. We are the state.”
In case you think we are joking, this act of stealthing, which Ms Fentiman claims has become common, will attract a maximum penalty of life in prison. Imagine that guys. A drunken encounter and the woman decides later she’s been violated. You are in big, big trouble.
So, is the government suggesting you take out a written contract before indulging? That sounds a bit like the marriage vows taken in a church or before a marriage celebrant. Maybe these feminists are on the right track without realising it?
No, these Labor-Liberal-Green party femo-Marxists are the same people who will tell you they don’t like churches preaching their “outdated Christian morality” to children. They send their LGBTIQ activists into the schools to tell kids that sex is for everyone, any time, any way, any gender – with a condom of course – because the comrades passionately believe in birth control to the point where they will leave living, aborted babies to die gasping on hospital benches.
Of course the femo-fascists will tell you their latest changes to the law are all done with “stakeholder” consultation. And who are the “stakeholders” you might ask? Well they are people like the Women’s Safety and Justice Taskforce, who produced a report called “Hear her Voice” which has been “supported in principle by the Queensland government”.
There are nine women members on that task force and just two males – Professor Patrick O’Leary of Griffith University and the deputy Director of Public Prosecutions Philip McCarthy QC. How kind of the taskforce women to allow men to have a say.
The ABC informs us Steven Miles and his Labor government will spend $225 million “to implement the recommendations from the report”. This includes upgrading IT systems in 81 courts across Queensland “to make it easier for victims to give evidence” and to expand the 24 hour sexual assault response team in Townsville to two other locations.
What this means, boys and men, is that you’re dead meat in the court system if you play around and pull the silly little condom trick – especially with a feminist magistrate, feminist prosecutor and feminist lawyer on the other side. Such people exist in increasing numbers, in case you hadn’t noticed.
Fentiman and company quote Australian Bureau of Statistics numbers showing there were 35,138 victims of sexual assault recorded nationwide in 2023, “an increase of 11 per cent on the previous year”. But what they don’t tell you is that there has been a very long multi-decade decline in violence between intimate partners, for what reason we’re not sure. Perhaps lower alcohol consumption plays a role.
What is also interesting is that their own statistics show that 75% reported cases of “partner violence” involve only pushing or shoving. More serious violence is in the 15 to 25% of reports. The statistics also very clearly show that most of the victims seek their support from family and friends – not the state.
Any kind of domestic violence is unpleasant, especially for children. Men and women with issues, whether problems at work, drug and alcohol consumption, debt or inability to relate properly, should discuss them openly with partners, or counsellors if necessary.
