Restore ‘Rule of Law’ before having federal election

Pic The Australian

By Peter Gargan, Constitutional Analyst

Letter to Angus Taylor, Member for Hume

The election in under two weeks must be postponed, to restore the Rule of Law and the Law of the Constitution and Commonwealth. Both major parties are under fire, and the one that offers a way out of the fraud and corruption riddled system exposed to you, by this correspondence should galvanise you to act promptly to get it postponed. The Common Informers ( Parliamentary Disqualification Act 1975. repeals S 46 Constitution and breaches S 77 (i,) Constitution. The Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948, and Australian Citizenship Act 2007. Both kill the King and with him our Christian heritage replacing it with communism.

In my opinion it is time for some honesty and integrity to be installed in the Government of the Commonwealth. Based upon my research, I am of the opinion that the Commonwealth Electoral Commissioner is a liar and a not yet convicted criminal. He is conducting an election to elect “citizens” to the Parliament of the Commonwealth in absolute contumelious disrespect to the collective will of the “courts judges and people” of the Commonwealth expressed in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and Constitution confirmed in the “Voice Referendum”.

The Parliament of the Commonwealth is the ultimate court, the judges in it are elected, by the people of the Commonwealth as Subjects of the King they like him are bound by the Statute 1 Will and Mary [1688] ( Coronation Oath) C 6.

I am also of the opinion that the Australian Labor Party Government is a puppet of the New World Order and has been white-anting the Constitution since 1948. The Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948, and Australian Citizenship Act 2007 fall foul of S 128 Constitution. So too the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 as amended. And also the Common Informers ( Parliamentary Disqualification) Act 1975. S 77 (i.) Constitution prohibits it. All alter the Constitution materially.

S 34 Constitution is absolutely clear so is S 128: There are certain things the Parliament of the Commonwealth is not allowed to do. The words ”’Until the Parliament otherwise provides’ is a qualified power. It is not unlimited. It has no power to abolish the King. It has no power to instill pagan values on the population at large, and call it THE LAW.

SECT 34

Qualifications of members.

Until the Parliament otherwise provides, the qualifications of a member of the House of Representatives shall be as follows:–

(i.) He must be of the full age of twenty-one years, and must be an elector entitled to vote at the election of members of the house of Representatives, or a person qualified to become such elector, and must have been for three years at the least a resident within the limits of the Commonwealth as existing at the time when he is chosen:

(ii.) He must be a subject of the Queen, either natural-born or for at least five years naturalized under a law of the United Kingdom, or of a Colony which has become or becomes a State, or of the Commonwealth, or of a State.

SECT 128

Mode of altering the Constitution.

This Constitution shall not be altered except in the following manner:–

The proposed law for the alteration thereof must be passed by an absolute majority of each House of the Parliament, and not less than two nor more than six months after its passage through both Houses the proposed law shall be submitted in each State and Territory to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the House of Representatives.

But if either House passes any such proposed law by an absolute majority, and the other House rejects or fails to pass it or passes it with any amendment to which the first-mentioned House will not agree, and if after an interval of three months the first-mentioned House in the same or the next session again passes the proposed law by an absolute majority with or without any amendment which has been made or agreed to by the other House, and such other House rejects or fails to pass it or passes it with any amendment to which the first-mentioned House will not agree, the Governor – General may submit the proposed law as last proposed by the first-mentioned House, and either with or without any amendments subsequently agreed to by both Houses, to the electors in each State and Territory qualified to vote for the election of the House of Representatives.

When a proposed law is submitted to the electors the vote shall be taken in such manner as the Parliament prescribes. But until the qualification of electors of members of the House of Representatives becomes uniform throughout the Commonwealth, only one-half the electors voting for and against the proposed law shall be counted in any State in which adult suffrage prevails.

And if in a majority of the States a majority of the electors voting approve the proposed law, and if a majority of all the electors voting also approve the proposed law, it shall be presented to the Governor – General for the Queen’s assent.

No alteration diminishing the proportionate representation of any State in either House of the Parliament, or the minimum number of representatives of a State in the House of Representatives, or increasing, diminishing, or otherwise altering the limits of the State, or in any manner affecting the provisions of the Constitution in relation thereto, shall become law unless the majority of the electors voting in that State approve the proposed law.

In this section, “Territory” means any territory referred to in section one hundred and twenty-two of this Constitution in respect of which there is in force a law allowing its representation in the House of Representatives.

Common Informers ( Parliamentary Disqualification) Act 1975.

S4
Penalty for sitting when disqualified

(1) Any person who, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, has sat as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives while he or she was a person declared by the Constitution to be incapable of so sitting shall be liable to pay to any person who sues for it in the High Court a sum equal to the total of:

(a) $200 in respect of his or her having so sat on or before the day on which the originating process in the suit is served on him or her ; and

(b) $200 for every day, subsequent to that day, on which he or she is proved in the suit to have so sat.

(2) A suit under this section shall not relate to any sitting of a person as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives at a time earlier than 12 months before the day on which the suit is instituted.

(3) The High Court shall refuse to make an order in a suit under this Act that would, in the opinion of the Court, cause the person against whom it was made to be penalized more than once in respect of any period or day of sitting as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives

SECT 4

Suits not to be brought under section 46 of the Constitution

On and after the date of commencement of this Act, a person is not liable to pay any sum under section 46 of the Constitution and no suit shall be instituted, continued, heard or determined in pursuance of that section.

Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900

SECT 75

Original jurisdiction of High Court.

In all matters–

(i.) Arising under any treaty:

(ii.) Affecting consuls or other representatives of other countries:

(iii.) In which the Commonwealth, or a person suing or being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth, is a party:

(iv.) Between States, or between residents of different States, or between a State and a resident of another State:

(v.) In which a writ of Mandamus or prohibition or an injunction is sought against an officer of the Commonwealth:

the High Court shall have original jurisdiction.

SECT 76

Additional original jurisdiction.